.
Happy birthday, Joseph Smith! 210 is a pretty great number. Two times three times five times seven—it’s the first four prime numbers all multiplied together! Exciting.
Though I don’t want to get too mathy. I’m not sure how much you care for such things:
According to Leonard Arrington,
“one person,” having met you,
said you possessed “the innate refinement…
one finds in the born poet”—
I don’t know who that person was
(and neither does Google)
nor do I know which innate refinement
one finds in poets
and not in, say, the sheetrock layer
taking pride in his work well done,
but I’m unlikely to bump
into you on the subway
so it’s academic anyway.
Instead, let’s judge you as we judge
any poet: by the words left behind.
While I confess thy writings to be
such as neither man nor muse
can praise too much, certainly
you’ve had your detractors. Even those
among us who count ourselves fans
can appear too enthusiastic—
make our praise appear like unearned praise—
and thus tend to ruin, where we meant
to raise. But still thy works move outward,
proof against our half-baked near-
improvised poetry, shallow remembrance
at best. A remembrance to be remembered,
at best, half a day.
At least Jonson took a chance, praising
Shakespeare long before his 210th,
But stay awhile, Joseph, it takes no prophet now
to see thee in the hemisphere advanced,
a constellation made there of your friends and rememberers
and devotees. So shine forth, thou star of poets,
for though thou hast left this realm, we shall not mourn
in night, thanks to thy volume’s light.